Mutations and Darwin's principles of Evolution Evidence

Most of us have been taught that mutations are 'the car of evolution'. That evolution took place through millions of these mutations.

As I began studying this subject, I discovered two very entertaining facts.

Darwins

First, no scientist has ever discovered a series of mutations that have caused a turn from one kind of creature to another. Unless this can be shown, no evolution has ever taken place.

Mutations and Darwin's principles of Evolution Evidence

Secondly, mutations are bad. They never have a distinct succeed (at least not permanently). Why are they so harmful? Because mutations are a succeed of information being subtracted from the genetic code of a creature or organism.

Down's syndrome is just one human example of a mutation. These mutations are all the time harmful, deadly or, at best, neutral (no known effect).

But, some would argue, what about mutations of bacteria that allows them to survive in an antibiotic substance? Isn't that proof that mutations can be good.

Not so fast.

These mutations are still bacteria that are lacking information that the normal bacteria have. The mutation (missing information) allows the bacteria to survive but they die off much faster once they are put back into normal population of that same type of bacteria. So instead of a permanent advantage, the mutation is still harmful in the long run.

Is there a human example of this type of thing? Could a harmful mutation literally be a good thing? Well, yes. But again it is temporary.

A good example might be blindness. Is blindness ever good? It could be in distinct situations. For instance, we know (through studies) that population that are relaxed have less of a tendency to be seriously or fatally injured in an automobile accident than those that are tense.

If a blind someone was relaxed before a serious auto accident (because he could not see the accident coming), it is possible that blindness could be the intuit that the person's life was saved. So it is feasible that a serious disability could save a person's life. But no one would desire to be blind in quarterly life experiences because it may save their life in an auto accident someday.

Once the blind someone is back into quarterly society, the disadvantage of blindness becomes apparent once again.

The process of evolution would need the exact opposite of mutations. It would call for the increasing of information (positive genetic information) not a subtraction of it. This has never been observed to occur.

The two serious problems with the law that mutations have lead to evolution is that there is no scientific evidence to show that they can succeed in good effects and there is no scientific proof whatsoever to show that mutations have caused a new and improved kind of creature (the previously mentioned bacteria are still the same kind of organism). Until it can be proven that mutations can be good (permanently) and that these mutations cause new kinds of improved creatures or organisms, evolution remains impossible.

Mutations, the 'vehicle for evolution' are heading in the opposite direction that it should be... If evolution were true. It takes great faith to believe that mutations could conceivably lead to new and improved creatures. To date, science literally does not give any evidence that evolution is possible through mutations.

Mutations and Darwin's principles of Evolution Evidence

Beltronics Rx65 Blue Adjustable Showerhead Shower Water

Brain Evolution and Charles Darwin's principles

According to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, some species carry on to survive and prevail in their environment, while other species tend to disappear because they are not strong enough. The selective process decides which species lives and which will become extinct, depending on their resistance.

This thought is standard by many citizen until today and they refuse to understand that Darwin was wrong.

Darwins

He was right when he discovered that the human being is an animal, but the evolution of the species doesn't occur based on the resistance of each species, as many biologists after Darwin proved to the world with their research.

Brain Evolution and Charles Darwin's principles

They accomplished that if the organism didn't have the basis to evolve until confident point, it would never go further. There is a program that allows each organism to know how to behave in its environment and how to solve its survival problems, together with how to find food and be protected from enemies. There is also an evolutionary program in each organism's cognitive mechanism.

A monkey will never be as thoughprovoking as a human being, no matter how many years it may live, because it doesn't have a allowable brain. It was not programmed to be as thoughprovoking as man. So, there is no natural selection: there are only many programs for each species. These programs define the animals' behaviour, the route of their lives and evolution. The same happens in case of human beings.

Darwin's conclusions by observing the selective process were based on the knowledge of his time. He couldn't suppose that there are some programs behind the selective process that prepares each species to resist natural selection, which means that this selection doesn't happen by chance.

When we try to understand the formation of the human brain and the appearance of the conscience, we perceive that this is a formation that took an incredibly long time. It cannot be something that could have evolved in our planet, because our planet is too young and the components of the human brain and their functionalisms are too complex.

The formation of the first brain and conscience occurred by chance at a time so distant that we cannot hypothesize it. It didn't take place on our own planet, in the same way that the formula for the formation of the first live cell didn't appear by chance in our planet because the planet's age (about 4.6 billion years old) is not enough to allow all the necessary combinations required by probability for the formation of the first live cell, since the permutations and combinations for this event would have been too many and they would take more time than the planet's age itself.

Therefore, we can stop that the human being didn't appear on Earth by chance. The human brain and the formula for the appearance of the animal life are ancient and could not have been advanced in our young planet, but all the animals, together with man, have behavioral programs in the mechanism straight through which they derive knowledge. These programs permit their excellent functionalism and survival in a hostile environment. Programs that might have being prepared by a classic brain for sure, since they could not have appeared by chance.

Thus, the human being inherits an ancient brain that can think and feel and is aware of its existence, but one has to pass straight through the same evolutionary process straight through which all animals pass in this planet, because probably, one has to be tamed like them...

Brain Evolution and Charles Darwin's principles

Bel Sti Radar Detector