Creation Vs Evolution - the Fossil article

Creation Vs Evolution - the Fossil article

Evidence is plainly not what we have been told when it comes to Darwin's theory of evolution. In the creation vs. Evolution dispute, nothing contradicts evolution like the fossil record.

Most of us have been told that the evidence found in the fossil narrative confirms Darwin's theory. The exact opposite is true. The fossil record, in fact, is the worst endorsement for evolution in the creation vs. Evolution argument dispute.

How can this be so?

Our teachers have taught us that the fossil evidence shows the 'pathway' of evolution. The fossils that are needed to give credibility to the evolutionary theory are 'intermediate fossils'. This would be the 'in-between' fossils that show us the evolutionary path between assorted kinds of fossils. If horses had evolved from dogs, for instance, then there should be many 'dorse' fossils found in assorted parts of the earth.

Unless we can find many of these types of fossils (there should be easily millions of these) throughout the world, then there is easily no fossil evidence that evolution ever took place.

This does not seem to be good for evolutionists in the creation vs. Evolution argument.

Unfortunately for evolutionists, no intermediate fossil has ever been found. Not even one has ever been verified in the last 150 years. (Whale evolution has been used lately, but this example is rife with scientific problems). The intermediate fossils of the past are now nothing more than just fossils of extinct creatures and nothing more.

Another one of these examples has been the archaeopteryx. This was a bird with claws on its wings. Many evolutionists figured that this was an intermediate form between reptiles and birds. It was learned that this creature was discovered in a layer where birds already existed. This creature turned out to be nothing more than an extinct bird.

There are easily no intermediate fossils left that can be used as an example. None. But we are enduringly told that there is.. The evidence in the creation vs. Evolution dispute is missing for the evolutionists (although the textbooks do not admit this fact).

Even Charles Darwin admitted that unless these 'in-between fossils were found, his theory was useless. He knew one thing about evolution: no concrete evidence supported his theory, yet. (But he was very positive that it would in the near future.) There are still no fossils to show us that evolution ever occurred.

Creationists, in contrast, have continuously proclaimed that the fossil narrative should show positive kinds of creatures with huge gaps in between each kind. This is easily what the fossil narrative shows.

The fossil narrative is not amiable to those who believe in Darwin's theory of evolution. The evidence in the creation vs. Evolution argument clearly supports creationists in regard to the fossil record. Until intermediate fossils are discovered to reserve Darwin's theory, it would seem that the fossil narrative is undoubtedly in favor of creation.

---

Guitar Toilet Flush Mount Harry Potter Book Boxed Set Refurbished Nook Color

Do Gaps in the Fossil description Show That Darwin Was Wrong?

Darwin believed that small changes or mutations in species over small periods of time would originate large changes - new species - over large time frames. However, although some fossil 'transitional forms' have been found, for the most part the fossil description does not show a gradual turn in organisms but rather sudden bursts of species production, such as the illustrious Burgess shale. Some population believe this wholly disproves the system of evolution, others say it must mean there are some serious gaps in our comprehension of how the process occurs.

Scientists have traditionally put the gaps in the fossil description down to the low probability of any fossils being formed at all. The system of punctuated balance suggests that evolution admittedly does occur in a stepwise manner at species level, with species remaining the same for millions of years followed by rapid bursts of change. To understand how punctuated balance might occur think a species as a ball in a system of hills and valleys. The lowest points of the valleys laid out a garage species. Most of the time when a genetic mutation disturbs a species it tends to roll back down into the same valley. Occasionally a mutation increases a species' Fitness sufficient to push it over the hill and into the next valley causing a new species to rapidly appear. But is this sufficient to elaborate everything? Why is it that at inescapable periods in earth history there were sudden bursts of millions of new species?

Darwins

Darwin's idea of small changes adding up to dramatic changes over a long time was revolutionary as before then it was questioned either any theories about the past could be carefully scientific. A bumpy rather than flat fossil description does not totally disprove Darwin's theories, but does tell us there is more to the photograph than meets the eye.

Do Gaps in the Fossil description Show That Darwin Was Wrong?

Do Gaps in the Fossil description Show That Darwin Was Wrong?

Reinventing Your Life