Darwin's law of Evolution - Evidence of a Worldwide Flood

Dozens of cultures have stories that talk about an extremely large flood or even a worldwide flood. But what does the ideas of evolution have to do with a worldwide flood? Everything, if scientific evidence can show that this worldwide flood took place in the old two to three hundred million years.

Is there for real any evidence to reserve this idea? for real there is global evidence. Each continent on the globe has oceanic fossils in it. In addition to this, there are maritime fossils in the highest mountain ranges in the world. At the very minimum there is evidence to reserve that water covered the highest peaks.

Darwins

If we explain strata(layers of earth) in other way other than evolutionist view, we could say that flood waters, huge mudslides and quick burials caused the formation of the strata layers. It is extremely conceivable that this happened since floods have formed strata historically in incredibly brief stages of time. This is what occurred on Mt. St. Helens when water built up and resulted in flood waters forming layers of strata. These earth layers were for real much more exiguous than the strata found at the Grand Canyon. But a global flood would be immensely more potent, forming earth layers that would be a great deal larger than Mt. St. Helens formed.

Darwin's law of Evolution - Evidence of a Worldwide Flood

Evolutionary explanations have a much more difficult time explaining the strata formation with the fossils preserved inside. Their explanation is that these layers took thousands or even millions of years to form. Each fossil organism and beast must lie there until it is covered with the sedimentary rock. This would probably take as long as hundreds or thousand of years to accomplish (according to evolutionary time frames). How many organisms are going to lie around long sufficient to fossilize, especially considering that large amounts of moisture and water are present...which is known to increase decay rates overall.

Some of these fossils would have had to be made quickly. In singular perfect moths and butterflies. From my understanding there is plainly no scientific explanation to show how fossils have been created so slowly. A gigantic flood would explain much better and agrees with scientific consideration while slow fossilization plainly contradicts the scientific facts.

Another question for the ideas of evolution is that many of the rock layers have valuable bends in them without any sign that they broke (there are missing fractures). This could only happen if the layers of strata were soft (just as they might be in the case of a world-wide flood).

There is also the reality that there is soil missing from the rock layers all over the world. Soil should be found in each strata layer if they were formed at a slow speed. The one and only thing that properly explains this phenomena is global flood. The strata are formed from sedimentary rock, after all, which is rock created from water.

There is for real plenty of evidence that points to the fact that there was a worldwide flood, or at the very least a very large one that would have decimated creatures all around the world that lived on land. If this is for real the case, then evolution could never have happened (or the land creatures would have had to begin the evolutionary process all over again). Evidence, in this case, is thoroughly against the ideas of evolution.

Darwin's law of Evolution - Evidence of a Worldwide Flood

Zoeller Sump Pumps bloom energy ipo